What to watch while you wait on a sore joint

What to track while you wait

Watch what you can do. Note your walking distance, stairs, sleep, and chair rises. Soreness matters when it keeps taking those things away. You don't need to score every day.

Make the waiting useful. A physical therapist can choose exercises for the sore joint and show you how far to move, while weight loss may help if extra pounds add strain. Set a date with that person to check your progress. If walking or sleep hasn't improved, arrange another exam.

Another choice comes from QC Kinetix. Its regenerative options are blood-based treatments prepared and given at its clinics after a medical provider checks your joint. PRP is the clinic's short form of platelet-rich plasma. Staff take blood from you, spin it to collect more platelets, and use a needle to place that prepared portion inside the joint.

How long can you delay knee replacement?

There isn't one safe number. Give physical therapy, medicine, or a brace the amount of time your doctor or therapist set. Before starting, choose one result to watch, such as longer walks or better sleep. If that result hasn't changed by the review date, talk again.

Surgery deserves a fresh talk when well-planned non-surgical care no longer helps. A knee that looks newly bowed or changed in shape also matters. So do less movement and steady trouble with chores. Your exam and daily limits count as much as the X-ray.

Some problems need help today. Go promptly when fever occurs as the joint reddens, heats up, and swells. If a fall leaves the hurt leg unable to support you, get help. Don't wait at home with those signs.

Sources

1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 89,996 patients (60.6% female, mean age 67.4) awaiting primary elective total hip or knee replacement found a significant deterioration in joint function (mean difference 0.0575% per additional day of waiting, 95% CI 0.0064 to 0.1086, p=0.028) and in health-related quality of life per additional day of waiting. Meta-analysis could not detect a relationship with post-operative outcomes, and patient responses to delayed surgery were unanimously negative.

   Cooper GM, Bayram JM, Clement ND. — The functional and psychological impact of delayed hip and knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 89,996 patients.. Scientific Reports, 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58050-6.

2. In a prospective cohort of 134 patients on an Australian public orthopedic waiting list for hip or knee replacement, 69% waited at least 6 months (median 286 days, IQR 169-375). Health-related quality of life deteriorated overall during the wait (mean AQoL change -0.04, 95% CI -0.08 to -0.01), with 53% of participants experiencing a clinically important decline.

   Ackerman IN, Bennell KL, Osborne RH. — Decline in Health-Related Quality of Life reported by more than half of those waiting for joint replacement surgery: a prospective cohort study.. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2011. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-108.

3. Pooling the OAI and MOST cohorts (8,002 participants followed up to 8 years, 3,417 classifiable knees), validated appropriateness criteria classified only 290 knees (8%) as receiving a TIMELY total knee replacement, 2,833 knees (83%) as potentially appropriate but not replaced more than 2 years after replacement became appropriate, and 294 knees (9% of all knees, 26% of the 1,114 replacements actually performed) as PREMATURE. Of the potentially-appropriate-but-not-replaced knees, 1,204 (42.5%) had severe symptoms.

   Ghomrawi HMK, Mushlin AI, Kang R, et al. — Examining Timeliness of Total Knee Replacement Among Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis in the U.S.: Results from the OAI and MOST Longitudinal Cohorts.. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American), 2020. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00432.

4. The 2023 ACR/AAHKS timing guideline conditionally recommends AGAINST delaying hip or knee arthroplasty to pursue additional non-operative treatment - physical therapy, NSAIDs, ambulatory aids or intra-articular injections - in patients with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis for whom non-operative therapy has already been ineffective and who have chosen surgery. It conditionally recommends delay for nicotine cessation and for better glycemic control in diabetes, states that obesity by itself is not a reason for delay while weight loss should be strongly encouraged, and conditionally recommends against delay in patients with severe deformity or bone loss. Evidence for all recommendations was graded low or very low quality.

   Hannon CP, Goodman SM, Austin MS, et al. — 2023 American College of Rheumatology and American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline for the Optimal Timing of Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty for Patients With Symptomatic Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis or Advanced Symptomatic Osteonecrosis With Secondary Arthritis for Whom Nonoperative Therapy Is Ineffective.. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 2023. DOI: 10.1002/art.42630.

5. At 2 years across two parallel randomised trials (200 patients, mean age 66), total knee replacement plus non-surgical treatment beat non-surgical treatment alone by 18.3 KOOS points (95% CI 11.3 to 25.3), and non-surgical treatment in turn beat written advice by 7.0 points (95% CI 0.4 to 13.5). Among patients eligible for replacement, 16 of 50 (32%) in the non-surgical group had surgery within 2 years - meaning two out of three delayed it for at least two years.

   Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB, et al. — Total knee replacement and non-surgical treatment of knee osteoarthritis: 2-year outcome from two parallel randomized controlled trials.. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.04.014.

6. In the SPACE pragmatic randomised trial, 240 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic back pain or hip or knee osteoarthritis pain despite analgesic use were assigned to a treat-to-target opioid strategy or a treat-to-target non-opioid strategy over 12 months. Opioids did not produce better pain-related function than non-opioid medication, and the opioid group had more adverse medication-related symptoms.

   Krebs EE, Gravely A, Nugent S, et al. — Effect of Opioid vs Nonopioid Medications on Pain-Related Function in Patients With Chronic Back Pain or Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: The SPACE Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA, 2018. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.0899.

7. OARSI 2019 designates arthritis education plus structured land-based exercise (with or without dietary weight management) as CORE treatments for knee OA, and education plus structured land-based exercise as core for hip and polyarticular OA. Topical NSAIDs are strongly recommended for knee OA (Level 1A). Intra-articular corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid are Level 1B/2 for knee OA depending on comorbidity and are NOT recommended for hip or polyarticular OA. Oral NSAIDs are not recommended for people with cardiovascular comorbidity or frailty, and oral and transdermal opioids are strongly not recommended (Level 5).

   Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, et al. — OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis.. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011.

8. In a 2-year double-blind randomised trial in 140 patients with symptomatic knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3) and ultrasonic synovitis, intra-articular triamcinolone 40mg every 12 weeks produced significantly greater cartilage volume loss than saline (index-compartment cartilage thickness change -0.21mm vs -0.10mm; between-group difference -0.11mm, 95% CI -0.20 to -0.03) with no significant difference in pain.

   McAlindon TE, LaValley MP, Harvey WF, et al. — Effect of Intra-articular Triamcinolone vs Saline on Knee Cartilage Volume and Pain in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.. JAMA, 2017. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.5283.

9. In the only randomised controlled trial to compare total knee replacement directly with non-surgical treatment in patients already eligible for surgery (n=100), the replacement group improved more at 12 months than the non-surgical group (KOOS4 32.5 vs 16.0; adjusted mean difference 15.8, 95% CI 10.0 to 21.5) but had four times the serious adverse events (24 vs 6, P=0.005). Only 13 of 50 patients (26%) assigned to non-surgical treatment alone had undergone knee replacement by 12 months.

   Skou ST, Roos EM, Laursen MB, et al. — A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Total Knee Replacement.. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505467.